What is the Mixed - Models Controversy ? From :

نویسنده

  • John A. Nelder
چکیده

Two papers have recently been published in this journal which purport to deal with the mixedmodels controversy (Lencina et al., 2005; Lencina & Singer, 2006, to be referred to as L1 and L2). In my view they do not represent the current state of thinking on this subject. My own work begins with Nelder (1977) and continues with papers in 1982, and particularly with Nelder (1994, 1995). Further papers are Nelder (1997), whose title includes the phrase ‘The great mixed-model muddle’, and Nelder (1998). In Nelder (1994) I describe what I regard as three false steps that have generated confusion and show how a consistent treatment may be developed. The two most important ideas are (1) marginality relations between terms in a factorial model, and (2) why constraints must not be put on parameters because they are required on estimates.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What is the mixed models controversy ? : reply to J . A . Nelder Viviana

We begin by apologizing for the lamentable omission of Professor Nelder’s interesting and controversial papers both in Lencina, Singer and Stanek (2005) and in Lencina and Singer (2006). Although the focus of our papers is much narrower than that of his articles, we feel that any manuscript touching the topic of parametrization and definition of hypotheses in linear mixed models should necessar...

متن کامل

Measure for measure: exact F tests and the mixed models controversy

We consider exact F tests for the hypothesis of null random factor effect in the presence of interaction under the two factor mixed models involved in the mixed models controversy. We show that under the constrained parameter (CP) model, even in unbalanced data situations, MSB/MSE (in the usual ANOV A notation) follows an exact F distribution when the null hypothesis holds. We also obtain an ex...

متن کامل

Much ado about nothing: the mixed models controversy revisited

We consider a well-known controversy that stems from the use of two mixed models for the analysis of balanced experimental data with a fixed and a random factor. It essentially originates in the different statistics developed from such models for testing that the variance parameter associated to the random factor is null. The corresponding hypotheses are interpreted as that of null random facto...

متن کامل

The two-way mixed model: A long and winding controversy

Resumen Background: With the 2-way mixed model, one a fi xed factor and the other random, the procedure followed to test statistical signifi cance of the random factor has been the focus of a heated controversy in theoretical and applied statistics, and the debating continues even now. One of the main consequences of this controversy is that the position defended in the classical ANOVA texts on...

متن کامل

The two-way mixed model: a long and winding controversy.

BACKGROUND With the 2-way mixed model, one a fixed factor and the other random, the procedure followed to test statistical significance of the random factor has been the focus of a heated controversy in theoretical and applied statistics, and the debating continues even now. One of the main consequences of this controversy is that the position defended in the classical ANOVA texts on the hypoth...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007